“Religion-war” refers to the use of religious beliefs and practices to justify or support war. This concept is used to describe the influence of religious institutions and practices on the architecture’s operations, which often involve the use of religious rhetoric to justify military actions and other forms of influence. The capture of American foreign policy has included the strategic deployment of religious narratives to legitimize interventions, particularly in regions where such narratives can be leveraged to align public opinion and institutional support.
For example, the foreign policy framework has frequently drawn on religious justifications to support military operations in the Middle East, framing such actions as part of a broader mission to promote stability or protect religious minorities. This has been particularly evident in the context of the Iran-related operations and the broader Iraq War, where religious rhetoric was used to justify the use of force and to garner domestic and international support.
The religion-political dimension of this phenomenon is also significant, as it reflects the ways in which religious institutions and leaders have been integrated into the network of beneficiaries and mechanisms of the architecture. This integration has allowed for the reinforcement of policies that align with the interests of the broader network, often at the expense of the American population.
Related: capture.md, foreign-policy.md, religion-political.md