Hillary Clinton, as U.S. Secretary of State under President Barack Obama, was a central figure in the 2011 NATO intervention in Libya. She championed the operation within the Obama administration, overriding more cautious positions from Defense Secretary Robert Gates. Her role in the Libya operation is compared to Dick Cheney’s role in the Iraq War. Clinton’s actions in Libya are seen as emblematic of the broader Western foreign policy architecture discussed in the text.
The Libya operation, authorized under UN Security Council Resolution 1973, was framed as a humanitarian intervention to protect civilians from what was claimed to be imminent mass killings by Muammar Gaddafi. However, subsequent investigations, including the British Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee report of 2016, indicated that the threat of mass civilian killing was substantially overstated. Despite this, Clinton and other Western leaders pushed for the intervention, which ultimately led to the overthrow and killing of Gaddafi.
Clinton’s role in the Libya operation is particularly notable because it was substantially driven by her advocacy within the Obama administration against the more cautious positions of Defense Secretary Robert Gates and others. Her role in pushing for the intervention was documented in her own subsequent memoirs and in extensive reporting on the internal administration debates. The operation was, in this sense, Clinton’s war in the way that the Iraq War was Cheney’s.
The destruction of Libya served multiple interests of the broader Western foreign policy architecture. It removed an Arab leader whose hostility to American and Israeli regional dominance had been documented across decades. It opened Libyan oil reserves to deeper Western corporate access than the rehabilitated Gaddafi relationship had permitted. It eliminated Libyan support for various African political movements that the Gaddafi government had funded and that Western policy had opposed. It produced the migration crisis that subsequently destabilized European politics in directions that benefited the broader rightward political shift the architecture’s interests aligned with.
Related: masud.md, capture.md
See Also
obama-administration.md, sarkozy.md, usa.md, foreign-policy.md, intervention.md