“Migration costs” refer to the costs that are borne by individuals and families in terms of migration. The author discusses how the migration costs of Western foreign policy operations have been borne by the populations whose resources have been directed to these operations, including the impact on public services, infrastructure, and healthcare.
The European migration crisis, which destabilized European politics across the past decade, was substantially produced by the architecture’s operations in Libya, Syria, and the broader Middle East and Sahel region. The European populations that have absorbed the migration flows have experienced substantial political and social pressures that have produced the rightward political shifts visible across multiple European countries. These pressures have been exacerbated by the failure of the European political class to acknowledge the architectural origins of the migration flows, leading to framings that present immigration itself as the problem rather than recognizing the operations as the cause.
The migration costs are not limited to the receiving populations. The populations in the regions affected by the operations—such as Libya and Syria—have also experienced significant migration pressures, with many individuals forced to leave their homes due to conflict and instability. This has led to a loss of human capital, economic disruption, and social fragmentation in these regions.
The cumulative migration costs across the European and American populations include the documented reduction in European fertility rates, which will produce demographic challenges across the next several decades. European populations face the additional burden of supporting aging populations through reduced working-age populations whose conditions have substantially constrained their capacity to participate in the broader social arrangements that European welfare states had been built to maintain.
The migration costs are part of a broader pattern of costs that have been borne by the populations whose resources have funded the architecture’s operations. These costs include the deterioration of public services, the degradation of infrastructure, and the broader social and economic consequences of the operations.
Related: masud.md, capture.md, foreign-policy.md, hungary.md, ukraine.md, iran.md